Wesley Guo Week 9: Pen and Sword

Which is mightier: The pen or the sword?

This is one of the oldest questions that is asked throughout history, and depending on when and where you are, you may receive a completely different answer. The expression “The pen is mightier than the sword” comes from the 19th century play Richelieu: Or the Conspiracy, but the idea of comparing the “pen” and the “sword” can trace back to ancient times.  The sword generally represents “hard” power; power achieved through force and military conflict, using fear and threats to achieve what you want. Throughout history, this has been the norm, as countries must fight to not be consumed by a greater power. You will see that practically every major empire in the world started as highly militaristic states that conquered their neighbors, no matter if it was the Romans, Chinese, Macedonians, or Mongols. Without having a strong military force to defend their nation, their infant states will be laid waste to by hostile neighbors.  Yet it must also be remembered that while it is easy to come to power through the sword, it is very hard to maintain an empire through military might and fear alone. Successful empires must also possess the power of the “pen,” and be able to inspire unity and loyalty amongst their people. It is because of this and more that the former two examples of the Romans and Chinese were highly successful empires that lasted thousands of years, while the latter two lasted mere decades before collapse. Alexander’s phalanxes and the Great Khan’s horse archers might be able to conquer the world, but they are not able to rule it. In the current day and age, the saying of pen and sword has taken on a new meaning, symbolizing how someone’s intellect can overpower physical brute force. But while this is true, some also extrapolate this idea to make the statement that the world is now ruled by the word rather than the sword. Just like any other time in history, both pen and sword have their role to play on the world stage. It is important not to be naive. The world is at a present state of relative peace, but this is the exception, not the norm. The pen has written the rules of diplomacy that hold our present world together, but the sword can slice through the thin fabric at any moment. As such, it requires large amounts of hard work and patience to keep the world in its present state. In the 5th century, the Western Roman Empire stood on its last legs. Its institutions long corroded, its state falling apart. The treasury lay long empty, with its reserves fleeced by corrupt officials and bribes paid to invading tribes. Those same tribes now brought the empire to its knees, with no army left to defend them. There is nothing more to be done, as the state has lost both its pen and its sword.


Spencer, Tom. “Pen vs Sword.” Tom Spencer |, 25 Feb. 2019, www.spencertom.com/2015/12/07/pen-vs-sword/.


Comments

  1. Hey Wesley! I loved the opening to your blog as it poses one of those existential questions, much like the chicken or the egg and such expressions. It was really interesting to see the origins of this famous question, as I was personally unaware of where this phrase came from.

    I really enjoyed your allusions to history in this blog, specifically military history from long-gone empires. I was able to understand the references to the Mongols and Romans through the little I remember from AP World, which was a nice throwback. One of my favorite lines from your blog is the one about the pen writing “the rules of diplomacy that hold our present world together,” while the sword “can slice through the thin fabric at any moment.” I felt like you did a great job with metaphorical and descriptive language here.

    In terms of the theme of your blog, I felt that it was really relevant to the modern day as the use of military power is being scrutinized more than ever due to the excessive military budget that many countries have, especially the United States. The conclusion I gathered from your blog was that the pen and sword coexist, having almost a symbiotic relationship with one another.

    Overall, I really enjoyed your blog and I found it to be an interesting think piece that caused a bit of introspection on my end. Great work!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Wesley! I really like all the metaphors that you have used in this blog post, which all make it easier to understand when learning about the power of the pen and the sword! I actually never heard of this questions before about if the pen or the sword is mightier, but I will say that after reading this blog, I definitely learned more about why this is one of the oldest questions asked throughout history and its significance in the world today where power is abused left and right rather than handled responsibly. I completely agree with you that it is important to not be naive and to not be ignorant about the issues in the world and the people in power since peace is something that is hard to maintain especially when we live in a world where some individuals want to use the sword to inflict violence on others whereas some people want to use the pen to impose rules that will build loyalty among the citizens. Both are important and mighty; however, both need to be used appropriately.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Wesley. Nice to see you again in this semester. Your title caught my attention because, I like swords. I was curious to read on, and I am glad I did. My favorite [art of your blog is when you said that someone intellect can overpower physical force. I agree with that statement, but it is also good too not focus solely on intellect or physical strength. It is important to find a nice medium between intellect and strength, so you would be smart and strong, and wont be able to be defeated as easily. I also enjoyed the part where you said that the world is ruled by words not swords. That part has stuck with me because it is true, yet some people still think that they can rule the world with a sword, and I just find that interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Wesley! I love how you incorporated history into this proverb about the past; it is clear that you are passionate about this subject. My family and I usually watch a famous Indian TV show called Tenali Rama, which has the recurring theme of intellect being more “powerful” than physical force, as you explained. I like your explanation as it sums up the society we live in today and contrasts it with what society used to be in the past. The Alexander the Greats of today are most likely big tech company owners who made it through their intelligence and decision making, not because they went out and fought to take over land. I also find it interesting that you explained that the current state is an exception to the norm that physical power is valued more than mental power. Instead, the current state should be the norm, not the exception because anyone can become mentally powerful, even if they cannot become physically powerful.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anagha Sainath Week #13: Embrace the Scavenger Hunt

Raymond Holmes-King Week 14: Japan

Flying for the first time, as the piolet. Raymond Holmes-King Week 13